Paroxysm and hijack
A heightened sense of consciousness reached through a terrible mixture of suffering, despair, exhaustion and loneliness forms Cioran's Paroxysm. Even with the dark nature of things involved it still is a very divinely feeling.
This, however, is an individual experience. A singular consciousness is pushed to inner extremities; a pain sharpened awareness that is a tragic intensification of being.
When the same awakening or lucidity is found in masses/population it no longer have that deepened consciousness. What particularly is concerning is when ground up experiences like this get expropriated by society in the form of zeitgeist/mood/values. The more such experiences circulate, higher the risk of losing the weight and existential cost they have.
Which would have been fine had the modern world with infinite avenues for this kind of lucidity been in a different state. It is always in a hyper stimulated state with agonizing inertia and half finished implosion. The condition needed for an even better state is there but the transcendence rarely happens.
The point being: Once a feeling becomes social it often lose the profound nature that made it significant in the first place. Collective hysteria never ever equalled existential crisis (as far as I know). A crowd may amplify a signal, but that is not depth objectively. The painfully earned emotional breakthrough is commoditized and stripped of its history. A deliberate example would be the symbols of resistance becoming mere pieces of fashion for the few.
This is one of the reasons I have a hard time reconciling with the societies that seemingly underwent a “renaissance”. Sure there was a change, but the fact remains that it is the diffusion from an individual seed that gets through the cracks and openings of the social world, not the other way around i.e a society in itself has no virtue in this sense and is merely an efficient distributor.
The problem is the party who gets the most heard is the so called “society” especially the “needs of society”; whatever that means. The demands exceed anything that is actually lived by an individual. The same “productive but troubling figures” that gave new thought life, are set back by the society. This virtue less condition is what is being conserved. A convenience based parasitic relationship in simple words. Trying to supremacize a mob is just lazy thinking (just as racism is, no matter how subtle).
Same thing could be said about the caretakers of the society too I guess. Going against the establishment nowadays is nearly impossible today. What used to happen every often, can only be seen romanticized in fictional media or in a weakened state. Taking permission from the same system one seeks to resist is apparently normal.
That is because the power has become more skillful at survival. They no longer need to crush every thought (although censorship is coming back in waves). This state/framework probably figured out how to absorb parts needed for infinite power retention and discard the rest silently. Therefore in the interest of an agency-less individual like you and me, the lucid, the extremes, and the dangerous they all should be hidden & protected. Even if they don't take sides. Their devious appropriation is not something to be celebrated but is something to be critiqued.
Until, the drums of liberation are heard – One Piece
- 𝒶


